Skip to content
GrowScope
Open app

Completed-Cycle Comparison & Trends

Once at least two grow cycles are archived, GrowScope shows a comparison table across all of them and a trend chart for one selected metric at a time — both distinct from Grow Coach's AI-written retrospective and from Plant Compare's live-plant comparisons.

How to do this in GrowScope

  1. Archive at least two completed grow cycles.
  2. Open Archive → Completed cycles → Cycle comparison for the side-by-side table.
  3. Open Cycle trends directly below it, and select a metric (yield, g/W, duration, or cost per gram) to chart.

Cycle comparison table

Category
Comparison & archive
Purpose
Show every completed cycle's dry weight, g/W, g/m², duration, and cost per gram side by side, with the best value per column marked.
Input
None to enter — built from the account's own archived cycles
Location
Archive screen → Completed cycles → Cycle comparison table
User action
  1. View — no input required once 2+ cycles are archived
Output
A table, one row per completed cycle, with the best value in each column (weight/efficiency: highest; duration/cost: lowest) marked automatically.
Used by
None
Related
Per-Cycle Cost Tracking, Grow Score & Achievements
Availability
Free, no AI credits

Cycle trend chart

Category
Comparison & archive
Purpose
Chart one selected metric (yield, g/W, duration, or cost per gram) across all archived cycles in harvest order, marking the best/worst cycle and overall direction.
Input
A selected metric; requires at least 2 cycles with data for that metric
Location
Archive screen → Completed cycles → Cycle trends, directly below the comparison table
User action
  1. Select which metric to chart
Output
A line chart across archived cycles in harvest order, with best (🏆) and worst cycle marked, and a direction label (improving / worsening / stable) derived by comparing early vs. recent cycles.
Used by
None
Related
Harvest Forecast Calibration
Availability
Free, no AI credits

Notes

  • Both features need a minimum of 2 archived completed cycles to appear at all, and operate purely on already-stored cycle records — no server calls, no AI credits.
  • This is distinct from Grow Coach (an AI-written, Pro/credit-gated retrospective on the most recent cycle) and from Plant Compare (which compares live, in-progress plants using continuous time-series readings, not archived cycles).
  • The comparison table shows plant name and harvest date as row identifiers; strain and light-equipment details are stored per cycle but not shown as separate comparison columns.

Frequently asked questions

How many completed cycles do I need for these to appear?

At least two for the comparison table; the trend chart additionally needs at least two cycles with data for whichever metric is selected.

Is this the same as Grow Coach?

No — these are plain data views with no AI and no credit cost. Grow Coach is a separate, Pro/credit-gated AI feature that writes a narrative report.

Can I chart more than one metric at once?

No — the trend chart shows one metric at a time (yield, g/W, duration, or cost per gram) to keep it readable.